Captain Zarmband

Riots

2011-08-11T11:44:00.003+01:00

Those of you who have followed this blog will know that I have warned about the state of British society for years and its causes. All I can say now is I told you so. The looks of shock on politicians' and police chiefs' faces is a sign that they have no imagination and have totally underestimated the corrosive effects of touchy-feely policies and the deliberate sabotage of British family life that has been encouraged for the last thirty-odd years. They've listened to all the wrong people and adopted policies that are the direct cause of these riots. I hope they now realise their mistake.

My heart goes out to all those affected, especially small business owners whose premises have been torched and ransacked by the vermin rampaging on Britain's streets, and, the ordinary, decent residents who have been subjected to this disgraceful behaviour. Will the law punish the cretins responsible? Frankly I doubt it.

Muad'Dib

2011-06-09T09:35:00.008+01:00

The aquittal of Muad'Dib on charges of attempting to pervert the course of justice, proves that jurors are more difficult to control than the police, the judiciary and the security services. A blow for British justice not performed by those who work within "the system" but by twelve honest men and women. Good for you.

The sooner people realise that all politicians are the puppets of the corporatocracy the sooner they will see that all of them are a total waste of time. They have led us into illegal wars that line the pockets of the ruling elite and have put us in permanent servitude by debt due to our currency being in the hands of private banking cartels. No politician will do anything about this con and indeed benefit themselves by maintaining the status quo. The corporate media doesn't ask awkward questions and the public stay in ignorance because most are too apathetic and brainwashed to bother to find out the truth for themselves. People need to get off their backsides and research the money system, false flag terrorism and shadow government controlled by those who have the real power i.e. central bankers, oil companies, arms manufacturers, the corporate media, pharmaceutical companies and their puppet governments. Time is running out, we are reaching a point of no return unless ordinary people wake up.

Seeds Of Deconstruction

2011-06-07T10:39:00.002+01:00

An interesting film about 7/7, false flag terrorism and shadow government dirty tricks. Well worth viewing.

David Shayler

2011-05-28T08:13:00.005+01:00

David Shayler's film "Mind The Gap" about the 7/7 cover-up. Would the government, the police, the security services and the mainstream media lie to you? Damn right they would.

Obama Gets Grounded.

2011-05-25T09:01:00.005+01:00

President Obama is currently visiting Britain and Ireland and the media has been boring us to death with tales of heightened security and the maticulous planning that the Secret Service performs on such occassions. Well, it seems that this meticulous planning was not as thorough as it should have been judging from this footage shot as Obama's limo tried to drive out of the Ambassador's residence in Dublin. Ooops!

Perhaps the President has put on a little weight due to his recent consumption of Guinness?

Is Bin Laden's Death A Hoax?

2011-05-05T10:15:00.009+01:00

Having seen the recent reports of Osama bin Laden's reported death in Pakistan, one cannot help feeling a certain unease with the official story. First we are told that the evil bin Laden was using his poor wife as a "human shield" only for this story to be recanted later. Then we are told that his body was identified after the world's fastest DNA test proved that it was 100% sure it was indeed bin Laden. Next his body is dumped (sorry...buried at sea) thus preventing further tests.

It seems Alex Jones is unconvinced too:

Can we believe anything our governments tell us? Well this gentleman, Dr. Webster G. Tarpley, certainly has his doubts:

David Icke

2011-05-04T10:04:00.001+01:00

Britain Is A Police State

2011-04-28T09:17:00.003+01:00

Many people have become increasingly worried by the British police. If you report that your car or house have been vandalised, or that street thugs are hanging around causing trouble, you will most likely be told that the police haven't got time to deal with your complaint. Funny thing though...they do have time for this kind of nonsense......

Story here

Can you believe this? No me neither.

Achtung! Papers....papers!

2011-04-15T09:19:00.015+01:00

Due to the current anti-terror hysteria it's a miracle that anyone still uses airlines due to the Gestapo-style searches now being deemed to be mandatory.

These searches seem to have four main purposes.

1. To provide work for otherwise unemployable, stupid, stroppy, fat women.

2. Allow pervy kiddy fiddlers free access to undress and grope our children.

3. To allow weirdo voyeurs the chance to drool over X ray images of naked passengers.

4. To groom the public and get them used to a fascist regime where searches, ID cards, and intrusive state officials have the authority to invade our every waking moment.

Think about it. When a job is advertised that involves working eight hours a day looking at a screen that shows airline passengers virtually naked, what kind of person applies for this job? Maybe some of them think they are doing important work to protect the public, but it could be that other applicants have darker motives.

The answer to this problem is clear. Avoid air travel and cut-off the supply of money. That way these unnecessary searches will stop. In case you're wondering just how effective, and indeed necessary these searches are, ask yourself this question; how many people have been caught attempting to take explosives onto aircraft and have been prevented from doing so by these searches?

Richard D. Hall

2011-03-27T09:32:00.003+01:00

Here's a website I enjoy visiting. Rich Planet

Stan Deyo

2011-03-08T19:58:00.003Z

Stan Deyo - "UFOs Are Here" documentary from 1977. The first two and a half minutes are taken up with credits/intro so you may wish to skip that part. Well worth a view.

A Load Of Ed Balls Or Is It Milliband?

2011-03-05T10:28:00.005Z

New Labour's ex-public schoolboy leader Ed Milliband is bleating that poorer UK families will be worst affected by Tory/Liberal cuts. Perhaps Milliband and his friends in New Labour should have thought about this before they bankrupted the British economy. Maybe he should raise this subject at the next secret Illuminati/Bilderberg meeting as he's reportedly a member of this elitist private club that arranged the financial coup in order to facilitate the New World Order.

You may recall that Milliband was a member of Tony (war criminal) Bliar's (sic) New Labour government who took us into two arguably illegal wars on the basis of provably false information about non-existent weapons of mass delusion. You may think Ed Milliband is pretending to give a toss about ordinary Brits when in reality he is, according to many, yet another elitist power player from a wealthy background complete with a New World Order agenda supplied by the Bilderbergers. On the other hand you may think he's a thoroughly good chap whose only concern is the welfare of ordinary people. If you believe the latter of these two statements please contact me as I have some DeLorean shares you may wish to buy.

CCTV Britain.

2011-03-04T08:53:00.001Z

I read somewhere that in Britain we have more CCTV cameras than the rest of the world put together, so why is Britain not completely crime free? We are told that these cameras cut down crime and yet no evidence is ever given to support this. As the cameras went up the police withdrew from the streets to a point where virtually no routine patrolling takes place. Real crime figures have gone up alarmingly and all the police, Home Office and politicians do is massage the figures to con us that crime has been reduced when in reality it has boomed.

The next plan is to get us to carry I.D. cards with an RFID chip incorporated so that the New World Order can track everyone as they walk around. This technology already exists. Many of you carry IPhones which have GPS tracking as standard.

You may think this is harmless, but what exactly are the powers that be looking for? Why do they want to track us like this? In the future when you're a hapless slave, stripped of all your rights, told how to think and dependant on the Big-Brother Corporatocracy, you will find out.

Was Doctor Kelly Murdered?

2011-03-02T12:47:00.002Z

More information has come to light to indicate the death in 2003 of weapons inspector Dr. David Kelly was not a suicide. A new report has found that no fingerprints were on the knife which was allegedly used by Dr. Kelly to slash his wrists. Other items found at the scene didn't have any fingerprints on them at all.

story here

Possibly the assassins made too good a job of wiping down these items.

Who did it? The CIA, Mossad, MI5.....you choose.

A Spate Of Child Killings In Britain

2011-03-02T08:41:00.002Z

The media in Britain has been buzzing with the court case surrounding a child who drowned in the car allegedly driven by her father. You will notice how the media have concentrated on this appalling case and have completely ignored the hundreds of thousands of fathers who are denied any contact with their own children for no good reason.

Notice too how a host of recent cases where mothers have killed their own children are kept quiet and any reporting of the stories simply refers to two children and their mother were found dead at an address. No details of what has happened are given because the mother has killed her children. However, in cases where it's the father at fault the media report all the details to give the idea that fathers are somehow dangerous to their children. When a mother who's killed her children gets to court she will only get a manslaughter charge, whereas a father in a similar case gets a murder conviction. Females usually escape justice by claiming to suffer some syndrome or deminshed responsibility, whereas a man with provable metal health issues will still get done for murder regardless.

If you examine official Home Office figures you will find that the incidents of mothers killing their own children outnumber fathers killing their own children by five to one. Mothers are the single biggest killer of their own children in Britain followed by step-fathers, but you would not get this impression from the media and government who choose to cover-up the true reality.

Many of you will not like me pointing out the truth but it is the truth never the less.

Watch The Skies

2011-02-24T11:55:00.006Z

A bit of advice here. Be careful when listening to anything by Dr. David Clarke. He makes statements giving the impression that he's an expert in aerial phenomena, RADAR, advanced aircraft and the like. In reality he's qualified and a specialist in "Folklore". Why is it that he turns up on virtually all British-made UFO documentaries?
You may well ask.

To get more information on UFOs and their origins go to: http://www.richplanet.net/index.php

RAF Bentwaters/Woodbridge/Rendlesham Forest

2011-02-19T11:24:00.002Z

Who's Stirring Up Trouble In The Middle East?

2011-02-19T09:55:00.003Z

We've all seen the recent uprisings in the Middle East. It may be a coincidence that many countries' citizens have simultaneously decided they've had enough of their leaders. In may also be true that one uprising has inspired others into taking similar action. But it also could be true that outside influences have been at work. I wonder who is fuelling the flames of discontent here? Could it be some kind of Western plot to disrupt the area? Of course, we all know this has happened before in many places around the world where countries and governments have been toppled to facilitate the installation of Western-friendly replacements. Wars are highly profitable to Western governments, banks and arms manufacturers too.

The tyrants who have been in power in many Arab countries were installed and backed by Western governments (mainly the Americans) for economic and political reasons. In my view these uprisings are a campaign to politically destabilize the region to facilitate another American oil grab. The story is being hailed as "pro-democracy" but in reality it is very unlikely that any of these countries will end up with a liberal government, fairly elected by the people.

What's the betting that:

1. More Middle-Eastern oil ends up being controlled by the Americans (to join the 70% they already control).

2. Middle-Eastern countries will end up with unpopular, pro-western, puppet governments backed by the US.

3. Wars and general mayhem will reap huge profits for Western banks, American arms manufacturers and mega-corporations (just like Iraq).

4. Ordinary Arabs will end up worse off than they are now.

Watch this space.

The NSPCC Trying To Raise Cash By Frightening People?

2011-02-15T15:01:00.002Z

The NSPCC claims that every school class has abused children in it.

Story here

There is no doubt that many children in Britain have lives that are far from ideal. But you have to remember that the NSPCC acts like a corporate business and many of its press releases are simply an effort to attract funding.

What is abuse? Well there are those who claim raising your voice to a child is abuse. Or that saying no to a child's demands for a new X Box is abuse. By lumping in such trivial examples with genuine violence you can ramp up the figures to any level you wish, and that's what this latest claim is about, in my opinion.

The destruction of the traditional family is the main cause of problems in childhood, but this is never endorsed by the NSPCC. Instead they encourage the single-mother culture and demonize men. I see many women in public who are totally incapable of parenting children with any hope of raising them to become balanced adults. These women live in the world of TV soaps and Jeremy Kyle and have chaotic lives that they blame on everyone else. They have "families" consisting of themselves and the progeny of many failed, and often brief, relationships with the dregs of the male gender. These women lurch from one bad-boy to the next, producing feckless, feral children for the state to look after. These children reach adulthood and burden to the state still further by becoming prisoners, permanently unemployed, or in the case of females, single-mothers. And the whole process starts again.

In Britain today, many working people can't afford to have children. Conversely, women on benefits are financially encouraged to have more. The result of this absurd situation is that more babies are born to the worst parents and many children have only a benefit-dependant single-mother to raise them. Meanwhile, working and middle-class families have fewer children because they are so heavily burdened by large mortgages and the costs of being financially self-reliant. The result is that more children are born into the worst family backgrounds and in my opinion this is a deliberate policy to dumb-down the population. Why else have successive governments permitted this?

Brian Gerrish

2011-02-11T16:57:00.004Z

For those of you who, like me, are fed up with the direction we in Britain are being dragged, you may like to watch this six-part film about Brian Gerrish.

If you're wondering why nothing works any more and no one in authority appears to care, I think you will find answers here. Why is it that we have a currupt banking system that fleeces ordinary citizens as its core function? Why do we have the bought-off politicians who say one thing and then do something entirely different? Why do we tolerate corporate greed that shafts the public and then lies about it? And, the ever pervasive move toward creeping, corporate fascism that I call "THE CORPORATOCRACY".

You should know about the lies regarding false flag terrorism that are spread by those whose agenda is the establishment of a POLICE STATE where we the people are snooped upon, spied upon, monitored, robbed, deceived, and all our basic human rights are taken away so that a priveledged elite can live like medeival kings. This is the future and indeed some say the present.

The British Police

2011-02-11T09:15:00.001Z

Here's an unlikely tale about a car window supposedly smashed by a bun.

story here

What! The police are actually investigating a smashed car window? My vehicles were repeatedly attacked on my drive and all I got from PC Plod was

"There's nothing we can do".

I even had my own CCTV footage of the attacks which clearly showed the perpetrator.....

"There's nothing we can do".

I told the police who was responsible for this and the other threats and acts of vandalism.....

"There's nothing we can do".

My kitchen window was shot out by an air rifle to which WPC Plod said

"We don't have time for this".

I rang up to complain....phone calls never returned. I wrote to the Chief Constable. My letter was redirected to the local Inspector.....nothing happened. More phone calls from me...none ever returned. I called again only to be quizzed by a civilian operator about my domestic arrangements and whether I was in a relationship???? Message left for Inspector never responded to. etc..etc...etc.

This is modern policing in Britain. A frustrating merry-go-round of inactivity, touchy-feely buzz words, inefficient couldn't care less work-dodgers, discrimination as to who is a victim which is entirely based on gender, race and PC quotient. And my friends it's all deliberate. Google Brian Gerrish and his thoughts about Common Purpose.

Need I say more?

Top Gear

2011-02-06T09:58:00.005Z

The BBC's Top Gear programme has come under fire for allegedly making racist comments about Mexicans. Comedian Steve Coogan has blasted the BBC for operating double standards, and I must say I agree with him.

article here

This Top Gear episode encapsulates the double standards that run right through the BBC. According to BBC thinking it's OK to make racist remarks about countries that have a majority white population but these three Top Gear presenters would have been fired if they'd have said exactly the same about a country that is is non-white. Indeed, these comments would never have made it to air.

The same applies to gender bigotry. At the BBC, it's alright to slag off and make the most spiteful comments about men but not OK to make any negative comment about women. Even violence directed at men is deemed to be funny by the BBC. Just take a recent episode of Reggie Perrin where his wife kicked him in the testicles as part of a routine that was supposed to be comedy.

The true sign of a flawed dogma is the assertion that only certain people have a particular right. All rights should be equal and constant no matter what, and the moment you suggest that it's OK to make negative comments about a particular group but not OK to make the same comments about another, your rationale is flawed, illogical and corrupt. The BBC, therefore, is flawed, illogical and corrupt. It basks in PC smugness that at times is nauseating whilst simultaneously indulging in double standards and selective morality.

In my view the BBC needs a radical cleansing starting at the top and working through all levels.

Andy Gray

2011-01-26T10:24:00.003Z

Andy Gray has been fired from Sky Sports for alleged unacceptable behaviour.

Story here

The only reason for this hullabaloo is pressure from Sky's female grovelling corporate sponsors who spew mindless anti-male propaganda in virtually all their adverts and programmes. The big-business corporatocracy sees women as the soft underbelly to relieve ordinary people of our cash buying the super inflated tat these corporations churn out. They don't give a monkey's about women; their only motivation is money.

There's loads of sexism in the media....nearly all against men. Just watch adverts, soaps and even news reports that blatantly slag off men. Double standards apply to everything in the media. Next week will someone who criticizes a male referee get suspended......don't think so. Will female presenters who slag off men be suspended....oh no.

Notice how not one female ever admits that there is blatant sexism on TV against men. Just watch "Loose Women" or for that matter any of the plethora of programmes and adverts that spew anti-male propaganda. I watched this Sky football story yesterday on the BBC News as they triumphantly wallowed in a McCarthy-like PC pool as each member of the team tried to out-do the others brandishing their touchy-feely credentials for all to admire. I then switched over and some dumb soap was in full swing. One woman said to another "You have to recognise that men cannot multi-task" she extolled followed by "....because they have such little brains" to which both women cackled with delight. Imagine two men saying that about women. Imagine the uproar and the scriptwriters/producers getting fired. Truth is such remarks with women as the butt of the joke never get to air but male-bashing occurs in virtually every programme and advert on mainstream TV.

I detect a stitch-up here and it may be that Sky’s powers that be wanted a cheap way of getting rid of Andy Gray. Who knows the real reason for this. Funny how all this off-air chatter just happened to be being collected and then released to the media. Who is responsible for these actions and what sanctions will Sky take against this person or persons? Somehow I don’t think we’ve heard the last of this.

Not The BBC News

2010-12-21T14:57:00.000Z

You will not see this on the BBC News.

Alex Jones

2010-12-10T19:38:00.000Z

Coppers

2010-11-16T11:17:00.002Z

I saw an episode of the Channel 4 documentary series "Coppers" last night. The series shows the police warts and all and allows officers to say what they really feel about their day to day lives. Many moan about the trivial nature of many of the so-called "emergency" calls they receive via the 999 system. Most calls seem to involve young females re-enacting scenes from their favourite soap-operas with themselves in the starring role. All manner of petty arguments now result in an emergency call to the police, who duly attend to hear the latest tale of woe from females who sound and act very much like "Vicky Pollard" from "Little Britain". An argument with her boyfriend, a fall-out with another slapper about who's been shagging who, a Facebook entry the little princess doesn't like, all result in three 9s.

Personally, I have no sympathy with police authorities which, in the past, have done all they can to poke their noses into the lives of ordinary people. They've encouraged females to view a non-violent argument as "domestic abuse" and report it as such. Now the system is creaking with the torrent of stupidity that is modern society, with its never-ending attention seeking behaviour from young females, the police complain. Serves them right I say. Perhaps the police could go back to dealing with law-breakers instead of pandering to attention-seeking little madams who obviously don't have enough to do in their lives.

Here's The News

2010-10-25T10:47:00.002+01:00

You may be wondering why the following press conference warranted little or no exposure on mainstream news programmes. Could it be that your daily "information" is censored by those who run our planet? You decide.

National Press Club Conference nach X-Conference 2009
Uploaded by exopolitik. - Up-to-the minute news videos.

UK Police - Total Failure?

2010-09-23T08:43:00.002+01:00

Here's an article containing a damning report by HM Inpectors of Constabulary.

article here

So, the police are failing the public and have been for the last thirty-odd years.

Why has this happened?

Firstly, the mentality of the average copper in Britain today. Most are not interested in policing local matters and only have their interest revived when they can;
a) Drive a fast police car with its siren and blue lights on.
b) Dress up like the SAS and kick someone's frontdoor down (usually for something quite trivial).

Secondly, senior police officers get large bonusses or not dependant on the statistical information their forces supply to central government (a scheme set up by Stalinistic Blair and his cronies). This means that the object of the exercise is not helping the public but providing massaged stats to get their bonuses. The police do this in a variety of ways such as;

1. Not truthfully collating crime reports from the public. In other words, citzens who report crimes will be ignored and the report binned so that it does not appear as a reported crime. The person reporting will be told "There's nothing we can do," or "We do not have anyone available".

2. Many people suffer repeat offences such as persistent vandalism. These people will be told by the police to report these matters every three months instead of each individual event. The person reports twenty or thirty separate incidents which then end up as one report. Hey presto - thirty incidents of vandalism become one, on the police stats.

3. Only take action on incidents that are easy to resolve and ignore anything that will be time consuming. This means that trivial domestic disputes, that may be nothing more than a verbal argument, will be vigorously pursued but serious assault, robbery and criminal damage will be played-down or even ignored simply because there's little chance of catching the offender.

Anyone in Britain could have made the observations in this report and many have been saying this for years, only to be ignored. It's time to sweep away senior management and get down to real policing and get the police back on the streets. Get rid of irrelevant paperwork and touchy feely policies and deal with the yobs. After all.....that's what we pay you for.

Madness In The Fast Lane - Manchurian Candidates?

2010-08-25T09:34:00.013+01:00

This is well worth a close look. Some of you may have seen the recent BBC documentary "Madness In The Fast Lane". It covers the strange and deeply disturbing story of two Swedish twin sisters who inexplicably ran onto a busy British motorway in May 2008. One twin was seriously injured, the other was released by police the following day only to murder a man by stabbing him.

Richard D. Hall from the website and TV programme http://www.richplanet.net/ suggests that the two strange sisters may be Manchurian Candidates. Watch Richard's programme on mind control, then watch the original BBC documentary "Madness In The Fast Lane" which has now mysteriously disappeared from the BBC IPlayer website. I've posted it here thanks to YouTube.

Note that no trace of drugs or alcohol was found in the sisters' blood tests. Note too the possessions they carried in their bags. Both had multiple mobile phones and various passports - odd to say the least, very Jason Bourne you might say. And finally, note with extreme concern the lenient way these twins were dealt with by the authorities particularly the one charged with murder and convicted of manslaughter. Interesting and very disturbing!

Richard D. Hall's Rich Planet documetary about mind control.

"Madness In The Fast Lane" part one:

Part Two:

Part Three:

Part Four:

9/11 - What Really Happened?

2010-08-03T15:02:00.003+01:00

Interesting work done by Richard D. Hall from http://www.richplanet.net/

Looks convincing to me. More convincing than arabs with box cutters.

Wake Up World!

2010-07-28T14:59:00.004+01:00

Edge Media - This Is Why It Must Be Saved.

2010-07-23T11:20:00.005+01:00

Please Help Edge Media TV.

2010-06-17T19:05:00.007+01:00

Coming Soon. The New World Order.

2010-06-16T10:06:00.009+01:00

Well, I Did Warn You!

2010-06-07T13:56:00.006+01:00

The new Conservative Prime Minister, David Cameron, has told the nation just how much in debt the country is thanks to the blithering half-wits of the previous Labour government.

story here

Mr Cameron argued that the boom under Labour was an illusion. The boom in financial services was a mirage, he said, because it was “conjured from years of low interest rates, cheap money and a bubble in the price of assets like houses.”
It was also maintained by unsupportable levels of immigration, which at one point accounted for a fifth of our economic growth while millions were dependent on welfare payments, as well as a boom in government spending, Mr Cameron said.

I've been banging on about this for years on this very blog. I also predicted the credit crunch too. Why is it that people like me could see all this coming but supposedly clever people who run the banks and our country couldn't? Why did Labour carry on spending despite dire warnings about public sector debt levels? This, don't forget, was before the banks got themselves into a hole and during the supposed boom years. Even before the credit crunch Britain had the highest public sector deficit in the Western world caused by the Labour government's massive over-spending. Was this some kind of economic coup designed to enslave future generations with debt in order to finance the greed of the New World Order super rich? Methinks yes!

Female Soldiers Told To Carry Condoms.

2010-05-17T11:44:00.005+01:00

British females serving in the army in Afghanistan have been told to carry condoms because so many are becoming pregnant.

story here

I don't suppose the powers that be have realised that many of these unexpected pregnancies may not be as accidental as they appear. Call me suspicious but in my opinion many of these females are doing this deliberately to scive-off from a crap posting. Get pregnant and it's back to dear old blighty for a cushy post away from the gunfire and IEDs, in nice accommodation complete with 38 weeks maternity pay. Once you've had your baby you can then dictate how many hours you'll work and which job takes your fancy, all on full-pay. You can leave the tedious business of being shot at to the men who of course don't get a choice in the matter.

Equal opportunities - don't you just love it?

The Nation Decides - Well, Sort Of.

2010-05-14T10:27:00.003+01:00

Britain has elected a hung Parliament for the first time in many years. There seems to be some good noises coming from the new government led by David Cameron. The promised repeal of some or all of the snooping laws brought in by New Labour can only be welcomed. The scrapping of the costly and damaging ID card farce cannot come a moment too soon as far as I'm concerned.

Gordon Brown has left a massive national debt around the taxpayers' necks, which will be difficult and painful to escape from. It appears that the army of government workers and longterm unemployed have some changes coming their way. I predict that the gravy train may be coming to a screeching halt very soon.

Lucky Eh?

2010-04-27T13:50:00.004+01:00

I was watching the news today as they played a video of the alleged "underpants bomber".

Story here

Funny thing though - all the other people in the video had taken great care to conceal their faces and had wrapped themselves in all manner of shamags in order to do so, except one. That's right - the alleged bomber. If it is a fake made by some agency for their own purposes, I would fire however did it. It's funny isn't it how these videos conveniently turn up in time to point guilt at someone who's been accused of some terrorist act? And in most cases the arm of the media who suddenly discover such footage in their archives is usually owned by a large arms manufacturer or is a TV station tied to the government. Or they have links to a company that's now making millions from some security devices such as the peek-a-boo X-ray machines that photograph airline passengers in the nuddy, brought in because of the "underpants bomber". It won't be long before all would-be airline passengers will have to have a colonoscopy to make sure they haven't got a bomb up their arse.

I'm becoming such a cynic in my old age.

9/11's A Lie? Please Discuss.

2010-04-08T14:37:00.003+01:00

Part Two

Sometimes I hope I'll wake up and find that I've dreamt the last ten years. God knows what's happening.

Even Better Work If You can Get It

2010-04-01T19:45:00.001+01:00

Just to prove that some females are leeches of the worst kind read this:

story here

Cancel that wedding my boy!

Nice Work If You Can Get It!

2010-03-26T15:56:00.005Z

It's good to read that footballer Wayne Bridge won a court battle regarding maintenance for his child to the "football socialite" at the centre of recent newspaper headlines.

story here

Oh dear....oh dear.....she'll have to scrape by on a measly £ 7500.00 a month poor thing. Perhaps John Terry might cough-up the shortfall or maybe she could bed another football millionaire? Nice work if you can get it!

Give Us A Job!

2010-03-08T10:54:00.006Z

Many of you may wonder what an earth is happening to our country. Everything seems to be falling apart and nothing works, particularly public services that are supposed to be there to help us. Ring the police and you'll be told "We haven't got time," or "There's nothing we can do." By contrast, there seems to be an unlimited supply of meddling bureaucrats poking their interfering noses into areas of our lives that no one asked them to.

Story here

Why is it that The Equal Opportunity Commission has nothing better to do than poke around quibbling about some hypothetical discrimination like the above? Unfortunately this is what happens to all bureaucracies which will always attempt to expand their sphere of influence way outside the original intentions of those who created the department in the first place. You will never hear the head of a bureaucracy say anything like, "My department's work is done, you may now cut our budget." No no no....it's always some story that there exists a huge hidden problem that requires more resources and funding, and of course more heads of departments with higher salaries...bigger buildings......more laws....etc...etc.

It's this bureaucratic expansionism that's at the core of many of our problems. The Home Office expounds the "Threat Of Terrorism" and expands into its nice shiny new building, with extra staff, more managers, umpteen extra department heads and a new gigantic budget to match. Indeed, you may assume that The Home Office has little to gain from cutting crime and therefore has no interest in so doing. Likewise for senior police officers who are quite happy to see gangs of yobs on every street corner in Britain because this enhances their own career prospects.

The absolute example of this principle at work is the European Union. In 1973, Britain joined an organisation that was little more than a free trade arrangement which meant we could import/export without paying duty to other member states. We also didn't need a passport when travelling on our hols providing we stayed within the borders of the EEC. But soon the EU bureaucratic monster awoke, and in no time the EUs remit expanded itself fed by a new generation of eurocrats and has-been politicians who now found themselves a very comfy existence in Brussels. Big salaries, big buildings, big expense accounts.....happy days! Of course all those eurocrats need something to do, and so they begin poking around in our lives in order to justify their existence and next year's expansion.

The only answer is to stop the expansion and stop the gravy train.

The End Of The World

2010-02-11T19:58:00.008Z

Here's an interesting documentary recalling the events of November 1983 when a full-scale nuclear war was only narrowly averted. Click on image to play.

Makes you think doesn't it. Do you still trust politicians?

Haiti Disaster - Now It's Women Only Food Distribution

2010-02-02T10:35:00.010Z

All of us are shocked and appalled by the terrible earthquake that befell Haiti. But as is usually the case it seems that the relief effort has taken on a political tone as some aid organizations are only handing out food to women.

Story here

Of course, the story bleats that women are being denied their rightful food quota by nasty men pushing in queues. I don't suppose they've thought that men who collect food are taking it back to their wives and children have they? And if men are behaving this way (which I doubt) then surely the women would be mugged on the way home from the aid post and relieved of their sack of rice wouldn't they? If men are so selfish, why is it that when the first TV pictures were shown immediately after the quake, the people shown digging in the rubble, desperately searching for survivors, were nearly all men. The vast majority of those risking their own lives in amongst dangerously wrecked buildings to save others were men as is always the case. Now we're expected to believe that these same men have somehow turned into selfish bullies shoving women out of the way in order to gorge themselves on the food aid.

In my opinion many of these disasters end up as a cash-generating exercise for large charities and organizations that are supposed to be handing out aid. These people collect millions from well-intentioned people at home who quite rightly want to help. But what happens to this money? If you're naive you may think that once you've donated your cash it immediately gets spent on food, shelter and medicine and is sent out pronto to the disaster site to be given to the desperate. Not so dear friend as most of it will be deposited in the charity's investment portfolio to provide future income. This is how large charities work and much of the profit from these investments ends up financing the charity's own infrastructure including salaries, office accommodation costs, computer systems and of course advertising. This is where the women-only part of this story comes in.

The charities want you to send money to them and to do this they need publicity. At the moment there's tons of free publicity being supplied in Haiti by the world's news media and it's this fact that is the real reason for women-only food queues. The media and the charities need the "money shot" to stimulate more donations and this image is far better if it is a heart-rending photo of a female or child, which of course always generates more sympathy than a similar shot of a man. A man starving to death is not as good a "money shot" as a woman or child and the same goes for the rescue effort. Charities want lots of sympathetic images of their organization helping grateful women and children because these shots have a higher sympathy quotient when it comes to generating more donations. From the charities' point of view it's far better to exclude men from the food lines because this tactic will ensure more valuable "money shots" which in turn generate more cash. In essence this is a cynical manipulation of the world's media and the general public and the same goes for the various military and political organizations that like the good publicity that these images present.

I never donate to large charities because this is the world they inhabit - a cynical arena where media manipulation is king and the charity's own self-interest is of paramount importance. They also have a political axe to grind which usually involves man-hatred as can be seen by the myriad of women-only schools, hospitals and food programmes that these people run funded by your money. Feminist thinking dominates most major charities and UN aid organizations, and the exclusion of men in these programmes is endemic and is a core belief of these people.

When I donate to a charity, I choose small organizations which are run by volunteers or to those that operate in a non-political way. This precludes most of the large charities who I wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole. Many squander millions on expenses and hair-brained, ill-thought-out, dogma-driven schemes most of which start with the words "women only".

British Democracy To End With Common Purpose?

2009-02-01T12:05:00.006Z

Those of you who, like me, have watched our civil liberties fritter away under this present Stalinist, big brother government, may wonder that this action is part of a wider agenda to set up a police state in Britain. At last I think I'm on to the true source and methods by which this process is being achieved and by whom.

Watch this.

Video clip

And just in case you do not believe that Britain is now well on the way to becoming a police state, here it is from no lesser person than Dame Stella Rimmington, former head of MI5.

"It would be better that the government recognised that there are risks, rather than frightening people in order to be able to pass laws which restrict civil liberties, precisely one of the objects of terrorism - that we live in fear and under a police state," she said.

story here

It seems that Dame Stella may have been reading my blog. Here's what I wrote on January 9th this year.

"Of course, there are things that need to be kept out of the public gaze, but when a situation arises where those in authority think they have a blank cheque to act in any way they see fit and hide their actions from public scutiny or become unaccountable, then we have a dangerous situation. Indeed, a situation more dangerous than the threat supposedly posed by terrorists and those who would do harm to us. There are also those in government office who would take advantage of events and public fear in order to increase their own power under the guise of acting in the public good. These people can do more harm to us than anyone sat in a cave in Afghanistan."

Police Have Lied About Crime Figures

2009-01-22T09:31:00.003Z

My concern over the overuse of statistics by the government with regard to crime has been confirmed by this story.

story here

This is a typical example of why this present government, which is obsessed by centralised control based on statistical input, is doomed to failure. As soon as any organisation is asked to provide statistics to justify promotions and pay rises all that happens is that those who run such organisations use all their mental dexterity to fiddle the figures rather than doing the job they are tasked to do. The police have ample opportunity to do this because their world is far too complicated to be converted into easy-to-read statistics and as a result all manner of scams can be employed to paint a rosier picture of life on the streets than actually exists.

Recently I had cause to ring my local police to report a gang of yobs causing bother near my home. A couple of days later a civilian police representative rang me to tell me that I could now ring area officers on their mobile numbers instead of ringing the police non-emergency number. Of course this little scam isn't to make life easier for me it's simply an exercise in statistical manipulation because calls to the police's main number will be logged as incidents whereas calls direct to the officers' mobiles will not. Hence an apparent reduction in crime and a pay rise for senior officers.

Get the picture?

They also do this to draw down funding from central government - cash that is earmarked for specific projects like anti-social behaviour. When the police want this cash they will encourage the public to report anything and everything in order to make the situation look worse than it is. However, once the cash is allocated the reverse happens and scams like the one listed above are employed to show a dramatic "reduction in crime" as a result of police action financed by the extra cash. In reality the situation on the streets has not changed at all but the all powerful stats show first a rise and then a dramatic fall simply because of fiddling with data input.

The only people who do not realise what is happening in Britain are those within the Stalinist, New Labour government, who, like their Russian heroes, are obsessed with centralised control, reward/punishment for those officials who run organisation like the police and general government meddling at all levels of public services. The police are not the only ones to suffer this fate as all state run public services waste billions supplying worthless statistical data to a government which has clearly lost the plot.

The only effective way to run public services is to have power based as close to the front line as possible. Only then can organisations, like the police, effectively do the job we taxpayers asked them undertake on our behalf and the vocation most police officers are itching to get on with if only they were free from government meddling.

More BBC Propaganda?

2009-01-21T09:57:00.004Z

The BBC's propaganda machine is at it again. They claim that the recession is hitting women harder than men.

story here

So according to the TUC (feminist dominated) and the BBC (feminist controlled) poor ickle women are most hit by the recession. The article then goes on to argue with itself claiming that more households are reliant on the female wage-earner than in previous recessions. That being the case surely men are just affected as women aren't they? Presumably hubby will have to work even more hours to make up the shortfall now that his wife has been made redundant.

It always amazes me that whatever the situation organisations like the BBC and TUC always focus on how much worse it is for women. It's a never-ending tape loop of propaganda that conveniently edits out all the negative impact on men and simply exaggerates the plight of women. I doubt that neither the BBC nor TUC will be running any campaigns to highlight the plight of men who on average work 25% longer working weeks than women. Nor the fact that 95% of those killed in the workplace are men. Nor the fact that suicide is the highest killer of young men second only to car accidents. No of course they won't because they never do.

Somethings never change do they.

Government Spies At It Again

2009-01-09T10:00:00.004Z

The Big Brother, Stalinist, British government wants copies of all e-mails kept on record.

story here

Why do they want to do this? That's right, that old favourite "the war on terror."
Of course we all know the real reason they're so keen and it's the fact that politicians and power-mongers are obsessed with prying into the private lives of the British people simply because they can. If the technology's available then let's do it is their war cry. And what war on terror? That's right that grossly exaggerated threat that exists largely in the minds of government snoopers who deliberately fluff-up the size and scale of terrorism simply to get draconian laws passed the public would otherwise never stomach.

Why don't they go a stage further and steam open all our mail and photocopy it before delivery? Perhaps they already do. In fact they admit they listen-in to all our telephone conversations and let the American do likewise. When exactly did we vote for this? Can you remember any political party having this policy in their manifesto? Me neither.

Various governments, past and present, seem to think that they can shout "security" and do anything they wish and often not even bother to tell us mere citizens what they're up to. And the definition of "national security" becomes evermore flexible as time goes by. It used to mean that the security of the nation and its citizens were at risk but now it seems that political embarrassment caused to the government falls within the remit of "national security." Anti-terrorist police recently raided the offices and home of the opposition spokesman on home affairs simply to investigate an alleged mole who had supposedly leaked embarrassing information proving that the government had lied about the scale of immigration. No-one at Scotland Yard has yet accounted for why thirty anti-terror police had nothing better to do than terrorise an MP and his family simply because the government are embarrassed that the British public has found out they've been lied to.

Of course, there are things that need to be kept out of the public gaze, but when a situation arises where those in authority think they have a blank cheque to act in any way they see fit and hide their actions from public scutiny or become unaccountable, then we have a dangerous situation. Indeed, a situation more dangerous than the threat supposedly posed by terrorists and those who would do harm to us. There are also those in government office who would take advantage of events and public fear in order to increase their own power under the guise of acting in the public good. These people can do more harm to us than anyone sat in a cave in Afghanistan.

Britain a democracy? Don't make me laugh.

A New Year Test

2009-01-06T13:05:00.004Z

A Happy New Year to you.

Here's an interesting little test.

Show this story to any females that you know and watch their reaction.

click here

I'll bet most of them laughed didn't they? I tried this with four females of varying ages and found that they all thought what this woman did to her husband was funny. One added that it served him right. I asked her what she meant and she immediately went off on a wild rant about the man being an adulterer. I pointed out that there was no evidence of this other than the raging of his evil wife at which point she exclaimed that all men are the same etc...etc. I then asked her if a man should be allowed to burn his adulterous wife to death if he found out she was being unfaithful? "Oh no," she cried, at which point I pointed out the lack of consistency in her thought pattern. She looked very confused.

It seems to me that a process of brainwashing has occurred and that many females think that any amount of violence or abuse is OK so long as the perpetrator is female and the victim is male. And that this violence can be for any reason, real or imagined, that the female chooses. Men should see this for what it is and that this belief affects most Western women. Females are intrinsically violent toward men for the most petty reasons whilst simultaneously howling in horror if a man uses violence against a female even in self-defence.

Makes you think.

A Very Funny Man

2008-12-22T11:32:00.005Z

Those of you who, like me, watched Peter Kay's superb send-up of those hideous pop talent shows, will undoubtedly enjoy this clip. I shall not post again until well after Christmas, so I'd just like to say good bless you all, peace and love to the world, and cherish and protect your freedom, the freedom of all the world's people and remember that we are all cast adrift together on this little, fragile planet of ours.

God bless you Earthlings for you have much to learn.

Here's Peter Kay with his priceless comedy.

The Political Police and the Big Brother State

2008-12-22T11:10:00.007Z

There's no doubt in my mind that many senior police officers have become way too ready to cosy-up to the present Stalinist British government. Many police chiefs owe their elevated jobs and rapid promotions to their close relationship with leading government power brokers, and I for one feel that this is a very worrying situation as the police's independence comes into serious question.

Here's one example in my opinion:

story here

You may ask why it is that the head of the Metropolitan Police's anti-terrorist branch is leading an inquiry into a whistleblower's leeks regarding the British government allegedly lying about immigration. These are not state secrets they are simply facts the government don't want the British people to know about because this would cause embarrassment to ministers who have allegedly lied to Parliament, the press and the British people. This is not a terrorist plot it is simply something the government wishes to keep quiet for no other reason than to save face politically. It seems the police chief in question is carrying on a public slanging match with members of the next government and making all kinds of conspiracy allegations, in my opinion.

The Police State, Stalin and New Labour

2008-12-18T11:08:00.004Z

I watched a TV documentary on Edge TV (Sky channel 200) about the alleged cover up of the truth surrounding the 7/7 bombings in London. Luckily someone has posted the programme on You Tube so it's here for you now. This is part one but the other parts are also available from the same source. It's worth a look.

Funny isn't it that New Labour's beloved CCTV cameras never seem to capture any key events like the 7/7 bombings, Diana's car crash and the attack on the Pentagon in 2001? All of these events were apparently missed by hundreds of malfunctioning cameras or the tapes mislaid. This is what we are told and our governments wouldn't tell lies would they?

More of this at Edge Media TV

An End To Sweatshop Britain?

2008-12-17T13:10:00.014Z

Britain may be forced to lose its EU law opt-out regarding maximum working weeks.

story here

The interesting thing to note is that in Britain long working weeks is a problem that almost exclusively affects men. One in four men work longer than 60 hours a week and this does not include the self-employed. Only one in two hundred females work such long hours and most work part-time, flexi-time or turn up when you want job-share schemes. On average men work 25% longer working weeks than women across the board.

Over course it goes without saying that the present feminist/Stalinist British government isn't bothered in the slightest that men work such cripplingly long hours. Instead they focus only on the way this affects women who as a consequence of their shorter working weeks tend to earn less than men when you calculate the equation based on weekly gross pay. If you use hourly rate the alleged pay differential disappears so the government never does this because they want to screech that women are hard done by in some way. Notice also the way the government quotes loads of statistics suggesting that the reduction in working weeks would cost the country billions of pounds. It's funny that this same government has seen fit to bring in all manner of increased maternity leave, the right for female workers to pick and chose what hours they work, and what work they will do, while it, the government, insists that these female only benefits are all free of any cost to employers or the taxpayer.

The current British government, nor for that matter any of the Western governments, do not care one iota about men and the blatant discrimination in our lives. Why should they, there are no votes in it?

Bush In Shoe Attack

2008-12-15T13:56:00.003Z

George W. Bush was narrowly missed by two shoes thrown by a disgruntled Iraqi journalist.

"Perhaps Sir would like to try a larger size?"

Impressive footwork by George W to avoid the flying footwear, however, it would have been better if they had hit. A pair of size 9s right in Bush's face would have been really funny.

The Untouchables

2008-12-13T10:47:00.006Z

The inquest supposedly looking into the death of John Charles de Menezes has turned into a sick farce, in my opinion. The coroner ordered the jury to bring in either an open verdict or one of lawful killing, thus allowing the police to get away with the slaughter of a totally innocent man due to a monumental police cock-up. In essence this means that little or no action will follow and those responsible will get away Scot-free. I wonder why the coroner saw fit to act in this way and who, if anyone, ordered him to do so. Cases like this confirm to me that Britain is now a de-facto police state and this is a view shared by others:

story here

However, former London mayor, "Red" Ken Livingstone, has come out in support of the police chief who oversaw this gruesome blunder.

story here

So there you have it, left-wing government supporters now have the police in their pockets in their quest to turn Britain into a Stalinist dictatorship. Perhaps this is why The Metropolitan Police's anti terrorist Special Branch could spare thirty-five officers to raid the office and home of an opposition MP looking for evidence against the Home Office whistle blower who leaked embarrassing information on government cover-ups regarding immigration blunders? Not national security secrets you understand just stuff the government is trying to hide from the British people. Quick send for Trotsky of the Yard!

Where the hell do I live Nazi Germany or Stalin's Russia?

What the hell is happening to Britain?

British Government In A Panic Over Benefits

2008-12-10T09:11:00.007Z

The New labour government are in a right old panic over state benefits, especially those paid to single mothers.

story here

This is rich coming from a government who has done all it can to encourage women to live the single mother lifestyle. Since coming to power in 1997, New Labour has thrown handfuls of taxpayers' money at single mothers with the result that their numbers have exploded. Now that the economy is in recession and as a result government income (tax) has declined and government spending (unemployment benefit, money needed to bail-out reckless bankers) has soared, our government is in a right old flap. Well, I hate to say I told you so!

And this is what happens when you reward people for doing nothing:

story here

There's one thing you can always rely on in politics and that is that whenever a Labour government leaves office the economy will be in chaos. Looks like Gordon Brown is running true to Labour's form.

DNA Database - Victory For The Innocent

2008-12-04T11:51:00.003Z

The European Court Of Human Rights has found in favour of two innocent men who asked that their DNA records should be removed from the UK government's database.

story here

This is a major victory for those who, like me, object to innocent people's DNA and fingerprints being kept on the government's database even though those people have not been convicted of any crime nor even been charged with any offence in some cases. The European court agreed in a unanimous decision.

It seems the Stalinists in the New Labour government will have to rethink their policy. It could be that the British people have finally woken up to just what an oppressive regime is currently in power in the UK. The quicker we see the back of this rabble gang of ex-commies, man-hating feminists and assorted power-mad meddlers the better.

Britain - A Police State?

2008-11-28T09:43:00.007Z

Many people like me are convinced that Britain has shifted from a free democracy to a police state under the present government. Here's another example of what I mean:

story here

The reason for this MP's arrest was given as "conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office"- what the hell does that mean? I've never heard of this charge before and it sounds to me like a euphamism for "conspiracy to cause the government embarrasment".

Whistleblowers have long been the guardians against malpractice in government and it should come as no surprise that a deceitful government, like the one we have in Britain today, should object to them. The police has no place in all this and should at all times remain free from political interference, otherwise we have a de facto police state.

Since coming to power, New Labour has massively increased interference in people's everyday lives for no other purpose than to snoop, pry and monitor British people going about their lawful business. The "thought police" are everywhere and it now seems that only a narrow band of political opinion is permissible. Anyone having an opinion too far removed from that of the government are treated as criminals. For instance, anyone who objects to homosexuality on religious grounds may well find themselves in court if they commit their opinion to paper or a website. The government has introduced 3000 new offences since 1997 most of which deal with what it is permitted to say, do or even think.

The road we are travelling is a dangerous one from which there is no return. The introduction of an ID card complete with DNA, fingerprints and tracking device is only a heartbeat away. In case you think this is science-fiction you may like to know that this tracking technology already exists using proximity readers which could easily track micro-chipped ID cards around public buildings. And remember that these can be mounted anywhere owned by any public body including town halls, bus stations, train stations, government offices et al. In essence anywhere in a built-up area could be monitored and ID cards tracked, all in the name of "security".

Is this the kind of world you want to live in?

Never Send A Woman On A Man's Job

2008-11-19T11:28:00.006Z

Following on from my comments a couple of days ago regarding hapless female workers and their never-ending ability to simultaneously screw things up whilst never admitting any blame, here's another example.

story here

You will notice that at no point during her post space walk analysis does astronaut Heidemarie Stefanyshyn-Piper admit any blame on her part. Apparently bad things just happened with her as an innocent by-stander. Well dear, you lost all your gear so how can it not be your fault? Notice too how her male colleague managed to complete the task without losing his entire tool bag. I wonder how Ms. Stefanyshyn-Piperthey was chosen to be an astronaut. Was it one of those quota decisions where candidates are selected due to their not having a penis? Got to make up those politically correct numbers haven't we? We can't have all those male test pilots/high achiever types hogging all the glory even though they are much better qualified for the job.

The "Right Stuff", I don't think so.

I'm sure NASA are less than thrilled that thanks to Ms. Stefanyshyn-Piperthey they now have to track even more space junk. I wonder how long it will be before Ms. Stefanyshyn-Piperthey's toolbag wallops the Shuttle?

"Houston we have a problem."

Man Management

2008-11-18T13:54:00.005Z

The British government has announced new plans to deal with child protection.

story here

This follows the social services debacle in Haringey, London and the death of "Baby P". However, these proposals will not address the real issue and that is the systematic failure of social workers to respond to overwhelming evidence that "Baby P" was suffering abuse at the hands of his mother and her assorted cronies. The reasons behind this failure rest, in my view, in the way in which the almost entirely female social services department organises its working life. Being female, they do everything by committee with no-one having any personal responsibility. This is the way females do things and it's what I call "Hobnob Management".

What's "Hobnob Management"? You ask.

I shall explain! (For those of you who don't know, Hobnob is a brand of chocolate biscuit available in Britain).

Females love talking and eating, so they love "Hobnob Management" because this activity allows them to do both at the same time. First invite all your workmates to a meeting. Lay-on loads of Hobnobs and coffee. Now sit back, scoff the biscuits, guzzle the coffee and all talk endlessly. Any decisions are now joint ones which ensures that nobody is personally accountable when things go wrong.

Men do things very differently because we use pyramid management. This pyramid consists of one boss, several lieutenants below him followed by various lower levels. Each level takes orders from the one above and reports any problems likewise. Thus, there is a clear chain of command and an obvious trail of responsibility which ultimately arrives at the boss. So, if anything goes wrong it's quickly clear who's to blame because there are no committees, no joint decisions, no communal shirking of responsibility.

The question is clear. If Haringey social services had been run by men would "Baby P" still been alive?

The answer is almost certainly yes!

Is This The Best You Have?

2008-11-07T11:31:00.008Z

Firstly, congratulations to all you Americans for voting for a president who at least seems to have a brain. The euphoria surrounding Mr. Obama's election victory is palpable and may be due to the joy of electing the first black American president or simply relief felt at seeing the back of George W. Bush.

The alternative candidate, Mr. McCain, I'm sure is a an honest and decent man, although, in my opinion, too old for the office of president. Had Mr. McCain won, many feared that he might die in office given his age and his medical history. That would have led to the frightening prospect of power shifting to his vice-president Sarah Palin.

story here

The thought of this woman having control of the most powerful nation of Earth frankly makes me shudder. Her performances during the election campaign wavered from frightening to laughable, and she often appeared completely out of her depth except when her offerings were carefully scripted by others. When left to speak for herself she showed a complete lack of any understanding of world politics and her statements were either nonsensical waffle or trite showboating. Her limited appeal seems focused toward bigoted rednecks and female voters. During the campaign many feminist pundits trumpeted her appointment as John McCain's running mate as some kind of victory for women, I disagree. The fact that this inept woman was wheeled out as the best female on offer has put back the idea that a woman should one day reside in the Whitehouse as president and I ask again - is this the best you have?

I should like to offer my best wishes to Mr. Obama and the American people. The last few years have been difficult and many problems await your new president's attention. Firstly, get your brave boys out of Iraq and Afghanistan and address the Palestinian problem with new vigour. Peace is achieved by wisdom and wisdom comes from the knowledge that self-interest never leads to a dignified world presence nor the respect and understanding of others. Our world needs cool heads and the recognition that the rights that we demand for ourselves should also be demanded for all the world's people. Injustice breeds hatred and hatred breeds war and violence.

Just one final thought - why is it that a person who has a white mother and black father is always referred to as black? Surely Mr. Obama is as much white as he is black isn't he? Perhaps one day we humans will not feel it necessary to care whether a candidate is black, white or whatever. Perhaps one day the candidate's genetic history will matter no more than his or her star sign or shoe size. Perhaps one day.

Goodnight Earthlings - you have much to learn.

Aloha Hawaii

2008-10-24T10:34:00.002+01:00

Many thanks to The Hawaiian Libertarian for his comments to my last post regarding marriage. Read his excellent blog here.

Many thanks mate.

Get Married - You Must Be Joking

2008-10-22T14:18:00.007+01:00

I'm often asked by women why I've never remarried following my divorce fifteen years ago? Females seem to think that I'm acting in a way that's almost illegal simply because I date women (usually much younger women) but never settle down. Regular readers will know all about my views on marriage, which are largely based on my own experience, and that of other men I know, all of whom have been royally shafted by the divorce courts at the hands of the adulterous sluts whom they were foolish enough to once trust. Add to this the misery of marriage itself and you'll soon see why I now fly solo.

For men, marriage is punctuated by accusing questions from your wife to which there is no correct answer. Any and all responses will be twisted into an argument and viewed as some kind of imaginary sleight by you against her.

Example: She'll ask "Is my sister attractive?" If you answer "Yes," your wife will accuse you of having an affair with her sister or at the very least wanting to do so. On the other hand if you reply "No" your wife will tell you that she looks like her sister and therefore you are calling her ugly.

You just can't win can you? Even if you avoid a reply altogether your wife will construe this hesitance as a sure indicator that you are in love with her sister and not her.

This is the main cause of those daily (or was it hourly) nonsensical arguments that any woman can conjure up out of thin air. A chance remark can spark weeks of nagging about something that only exists inside your wife's own head. An innocent conversation with a friend will be construed into a rampant affair, while her outrageous flirting with other men is OK.

The other option is to stay single and play the field. A woman is only any use when the relationship is new. That's because she's trying to snare you and as such she controls her behaviour. Once she gets comfortable her real personality will appear like a genie from a bottle. At that point any sensible man says "See yer" and heads for the Emergency Exit. Indeed, great fun can be had by doing precisely that. For instance; if you've reached the tipping point where missy is about to become your ex-girlfriend, take her out to some remote pub and wait for her to start complaining. At this point pretend to go to the toilet but instead go home leaving her with an expensive taxi fare home. Why not? The funny thing is that when you do this she'll beg and plead with you to take her back. Don't believe me? Then try it.

Banks Say "Don't Blame Us!"

2008-10-02T14:46:00.002+01:00

The credit crunch crisis rolls on and a popular theme has developed. Bank executives all claim that the current drama is nothing to do with them and entirely due to world events. They also claim that no-one could have foreseen the impending danger. Well, my friends, this is total crap because I've been advocating for the last three years that just such a financial crisis was an inevitable consequence of the banks' behaviour. Unfortunately, the banks were trapped by their own greed and continued to lend money to those who could not afford it, simply because they were making such huge profits by doing so. The banks were in a situation similar to holding a wolf by its ears - you don't want to do it, but you dare not let go!

For the last ten years, bank executives have paid themselves massive salaries and bonuses on the back of these huge profits, but now it's all gone wrong these same people claim it's not their fault. Indeed, one bank executive claimed the other night on TV that the current crisis came about completely out of the blue. In that case perhaps the banks should be paying me £ 4,000,000 a year as a consultant, although my predictions have been available for the last three years free of charge on this very blog!

As usual, the bank fat cats will escape with their fortunes intact, and it will be ordinary people and the taxpayer will end up footing the bill for their incompetence. And, while we're at it.....what about the governments who allowed this to happen by permitting the financial institutions to "self regulate", a euphemism for letting them do as they please?

Who The Hell Are You Talking To?

2008-09-24T14:22:00.009+01:00

Here's two little anecdotes for you to highlight modern women's attitudes towards men.

Yesterday, I was out walking my dog when I had occasion to cross a busy street at the height of the morning rush-hour. Sensibly, I did as I always do and used the pedestrian crossing. After a short delay the lights changed and the little green man illuminated, whereupon I began to cross. About half way across the road, a car which was waiting at the lights, suddenly revved up and lurched forward toward me and my dog. I looked round to see a black BMW and its female driver. I walked on and reached the other side of the road and as I did I heard a screeching voice behind me. I looked round and saw the female BMW driver shouting out of the car's descending driver's window. She was screaming something about me giving her "dirty looks" and claimed that she only revved her engine because her car was rolling back. Her excuses were punctuated by various expletives and a certain amount of name-calling. I asked her what that had to do with me and why she felt it necessary to shout abuse across the street in my direction when it was she who was in control of the car (I use the word "control" loosely). I also advised her that cars are fitted with a handbrake and that perhaps she should take more driving lessons if she hadn't yet fathomed out her handbrake's whereabouts. Exit at speed one still shouting female driver.

The day before I was in my bank paying in some cheques when a small dog appeared looking somewhat lost. It was a tiny little thing, a cutesy breed silly females tend to have. I picked it up and asked the cashier if she knew whose dog it was. A few enquiries were made behind the counter to her colleagues and out rushed a rather fat, ugly young woman with a boorish manner. "Give it 'ere" she commanded, adding "I know where it lives". Whereupon she virtually snatched the dog without so much as a by-your-leave. Obviously she fancied being the hero.

I've noticed this more and more these days. Women, it seems, think that they can shout and bawl at any man they choose, simply because they feel like it. They also seem oblivious to the fact that social protocols exist (or used to) that affect the way an individual should speak to another person. Many women talk to men in the same manner in which they speak to their husbands even when the man in question is a customer of their employer. This disrespectful treatment is exclusively reserved for men of course, as other females are usually spoken to in the correct way. It's not surprising that this occurs because the media, feminized schools and mangina/man-hater politicians all indulge in this behaviour and show a general lack of respect for men.

So I ask again, "Who the hell are you talking to?"

Big Brother Is Watching!

2008-09-15T11:03:00.003+01:00

There's anger at the revelation that British car drivers' travel details are being held on computer by the police.

story here

I can just hear the usual Big Brother proponents shouting "If you've nothing to hide, you've nothing to fear", they usual do, and their response is just as ridiculous when used in this case, where millions of INNOCENT motorists are snooped on just because a few wrongdoers need to be caught. On this basis any Gestapo-style tactic can be justified- including the erosion of all our civil liberties and human rights. Perhaps the police should randomly raid people's homes just to make sure they're not doing anything illegal? Well "If you've nothing to hide......."

When did we vote for this? A DNA database with people on it who have never been convicted of any crime, our telephone calls and e-mails snooped upon by a foreign government (American) using Project Echelon, and now even our driving journeys are to be logged and kept for five years.

Britain a democracy? Don't make me laugh!

Nice Woman?

2008-09-11T13:54:00.003+01:00

Here's the story of yet another "home alone mother".

story here

There seems to be an endless supply of this type of self-centred female who cares nothing for her kids and yet maintains the guise of the caring mother. When will society wise up to the fact that females are more capable of evil than men? What's the betting that by the time the case comes to court (if at all) she'll have dreamt up some BS about being abused/forced/coerced/suffering from some syndrome/he made me do it/ I'm the victim - kind of excuse.

Glass Ceiling?

2008-09-04T08:59:00.008+01:00

Women are less likely to be in a top job than this time last year, according to this report.

story here

Personally speaking, I'm sick and tired of this tosh. Notice who wrote this report - a government bureaucracy whose role in life is to expand its own size by finding imaginary discrimination. Note too how they insist that it's up to businesses to role out the red carpet for females and adopt female-friendly working practices. I'll translate what that actually means - females turn up when they feel like it and expect everyone else to fit in with their comfort zone, personal demands and out-of-hours commitments. Why the hell should they? If a man wants a top job he has to work 60 plus hours a week and if he can't it's out you go mate.

If someone wants a top job then it's up to them to meet the criteria required, not up to their employer to fall over themselves to accommodate their new Chief Executive's wish list and domestic arrangements. This goes with the territory and the higher up the ladder you go the more it applies.

Most company directors are, like me, in that position because they formed their own company. In other words - directors are largely self-made individuals who got off their backsides and did something for themselves, instead of waiting for fortune to fall into their lap. This is an area of life that women fail at because they are not self-starters and tend to rely on affirmative action schemes to get where they want to be, and every change in their lives has to be guaranteed, underwritten and tailor-made to suit their needs. In other words - as far as a woman is concerned it's me first, company second. Not good enough I'm afraid, and because directors are judged by their worth to the business it's no good simply demanding what you want from your new post.

There's a saying in business that sooner or later you'll find your own level based on your worth, it seems likely that principle still holds true.

Recession About To Hit Britain

2008-08-18T09:22:00.004+01:00

Britain is about to go into recession according to experts.

story here

The Labour government blames world economic factors for our country's woes and claims there's nothing they can do except weather the storm. This is complete tosh of course and much of the damage is a direct result of Labour's policies. When they first came to power their main agenda was to ensure that they did not again experience eighteen years in opposition. With this in mind, Labour indulged in a massive campaign of social engineering with the intention of making more Britons dependent on big government.

They did this mainly in two ways;

1. By creating a government dependent underclass who rely on state benefits for their income. This group will always vote Labour because it's in their interests to vote for a government that increases state benefits. The main targeted group was and still is single mothers. Labour has done all it can to destroy the traditional family and encourage women to live on their own, dependent on social security. At the same time fathers are milked of cash by way of CSA payments and increased taxes. The result has been an explosion in the numbers of single mothers on benefit with all the attended social problems this causes.

2. The creation of huge amounts of government bureaucracy. This means that more people now work for the government than at any time in history. Indeed, more than half of Britons rely on the government for most of their income. I've said before that this is Marxism by the back door. Again, this means more Labour voters as people who work for the government tend to vote Labour, the very party that created their worthless jobs in the first place. Most of these jobs are unproductive and many involve countless numbers of camera watchers, litter monitors and people counting lamp posts.

The result of all this is simple. More voters for Labour paid for by the taxpayer and by massive public borrowing - Britain has the highest public sector borrowing rate in the Western world. All this took place while the economy boomed which meant lots of tax revenue for the government. But instead of saving this bonanza of cash for a rainy day, Labour's spent the lot and more in the ways listed above and borrowed massively into the bargain. Unfortunately, the economy is now slipping into recession which means that the tax bonanza has stopped and the Treasury now has fewer tax pounds landing in its lap. Government spending on the other hand is increasing as more people sign on the dole and all those single mothers and government bureacrates still need paying. So it's a double whammy for the Treasury - more money going out and less tax money coming in.

Of course, the government could have foreseen this problem simply by reading my blog as I've been predicting this very situation for the last three years. What they should have done is save some of that lovely tax money for a rainy day and spent it on regeneration programmes to keep building firms in business. There are plenty of crap housing estates in Britain and most are owned by the government. At a time when major building companies are mothballing projects and laying off workers now would be a good opportunity to regenerate poor areas and keep workers in work paying taxes. As an added benefit the government could get the work done at bargain basement prices available because of the recession. I'm sure that many major house building companies would line up to do this work even at low profit margins, simply to keep their workers and businesses ticking over during the recession.

Unfortunately, this is an option not readily available to this government because they've spent all the boomtime tax money on social engineering that only benefits their own party and not the country as a whole.

Violent Females

2008-08-09T18:06:00.005+01:00

Female violence is on the increase in Britain and that's official.

story here

Furthermore, the figures are distorted by the lenient way in which females are dealt with by the police, the Crime Prosecution Service and the courts. It seems the police are at last changing their gender discrimination against men and are starting to deal with females in the same way as men have always been treated. Notice how this provokes the usual "it's not fair" response from the offenders' charity, no doubt a mangina spokesperson fully brainwashed by gender/diversity courses.

Barry George Found Not Guilty Of Dando Murder

2008-08-01T15:38:00.010+01:00

Barry George has been released after being cleared of the murder of Jill Dando.

Story here

In my opinion the case was one of the flimsiest in legal history and relied almost totally on a tiny spec of supposed gunshot residue allegedly found in George's jacket. The only other direct evidence was the testimony of an apparent eye witness who picked Barry George from a video line-up 15 months after the murder despite having seen the suspect for a matter of a few seconds on the day of the murder. The rest of the case against George was largely circumstantial evidence that painted him as a starstruck stalker obsessed with Jill Dando. How this case ever came to court is beyond me. The real answer to who killed Jill Dando probably lies in the files of the Serbian secret service, in my opinion. And, it's my belief that the powers that be knew this all along.

At the time of the trial I wrote this:

The main part of the prosecution case was a particle of gunpowder found on Barry George's clothing. This tiny speck was used as evidence that he had recently fired a gun or handled a firearm. His defence team are now claiming that armed police officers were present during his arrest and as such could have inadvertently contaminated his clothing with the speck of gunpowder. Police had previously denied this saying that all the officers present where unarmed.

Just after the murder the police announced that following a ballistics report the suspected murder weapon was a Makarov 9mm pistol. This is a weapon manufactured in Russia and was the weapon of choice of most of the former Eastern Block's security services, including the Serbian. Later, the police retracted the Makarov statement and changed the suspected weapon to a Browning 9mm which is British in origin. Why the confusion? Why did the police initially state that the pistol used was a Russian made Makarov, a relatively rare weapon in Britain, and then change their story to say that it was a Browning?

I've long felt that the murder of Jill Dando was more to do with Serbian agents or a terror group with links to the former Yugoslavia. Jill Dando's murder occurred a few days after British and American jets bombed a Serbian TV station killing many staff. Some feel that Jill Dando's murder may have been retaliation for this incident. So the question is, did the government and the police know about this and is this the reason that the murder weapon's origin was amended?

Another strange thing about the case is the lack of eyewitnesses. The crime happened in a busy suburban street in the middle of the day and yet no one saw Barry George leaving the scene at the time of the murder. One witness claimed she'd seen Barry George in the street several hours before the killing. However, this witness picked out Barry George from a video line-up a year after the murder. By her own admission she said that she had only seen him for a few seconds early in the morning on the day of the murder. I ask you this question; could you pick out a person that you'd seen for less than five seconds a year earlier? I'm sure I couldn't. Add to this the fact that at the time she saw the man the murder was several hours away and so she would have no reason to pay this man any particular attention. My electricity meter was read last week by a man I spoke to for a few seconds. I could not identify him a week later let alone pick him out after a year had elapsed. The human mind is not equipped to do this. People who live in busy cities do not remember or even notice the faces of strangers they pass on the street.

At his trial, much was made of Barry George's inability to account for his movements on the day of the murder. The police claimed that this pointed to his guilt. Since they did not question him until a year after the murder and the fact they George has learning difficulties, it is hardly surprising that his account of his movements were sketchy. In my view this points to his innocence not his guilt since it is perfectly normal that a person cannot give a detailed account of their movements a year after the fact. A guilty person may provide a detailed account of the events of a year earlier but this may indicate that their responses had been previously rehearsed in anticipation of police questioning. The police also stated that Barry George had a large number of photographs of Jill Dando in his home. This gave the impression that he had these pictures hanging on his the walls of his home. This was not the case as the photographs were in a large quantity of old magazines which were in bundles. In the months before Jill Dando's death she featured heavily in such magazines as her fame was widespread. It's hardly surprising that the quantity of magazines stored in George's home featured many photographs of her. The police claimed that this showed that Barry George was an obsessed stalker with a fixation on Jill Dando and that this is the reason, they claim, that he killed her. They implied that his home was a shrine to Jill Dando. Was this really the case or simply selective evidence gathering?

Barry George has learning difficulties so it's unlikely that he'd be capable of planning and carrying out a crime like this without dozens of witnesses seeing him fleeing from the scene. The single shot that killed Jill Dando was fired at point-blank range so the murderer is likely to have had large amounts of her blood on him, something which would have undoubtedly caused alarm to witnesses who would have noticed him if, as is claimed by the police, he had fled on foot. In my opinion the lack of eyewitnesses points to a well drilled operation involving at least one vehicle and a cool team of participants who left the scene quietly and without fuss so as not to draw attention to themselves. Hardly the work of a lone assassin with learning difficulties, working alone and fleeing the scene on foot covered in blood.

Has this murder become a political issue rather than a criminal investigation? If it has it may well suit certain interested parties that the culprit is shown to be a lone assassin rather than the result of a complex conspiracy. Lone gunman....conspiracy theory........cover up........does this remind you of anything?

Some investigators, such as S. C. Lomax, believe that the murderer was known to Jill Dando. Mr. Lomax has written a book on the subject entitled "Who Killed Jill Dando?" He believes he knows the killer's identity. This theory is certainly worth considering. It is also worth acknowledging that high profile murders place the police under massive media pressure to solve the case. Can this tempt them into placing the blame on a convenient, vulnerable suspect rather than delving further into a very complex and difficult case?

Whether the killer was politically motivated or a person from Jill Dando's past seeking some form of revenge, it is clear that many feel that Barry George is a unlikely candidate to have committed such a carefully planned and executed murder.

Lap Dancing Anyone?

2008-07-29T15:46:00.002+01:00

Conservative shadow minister for women (whatever that is) Theresa May has announced plans to give local councils more power to stop lap dancing clubs opening in their area.

story here

What's interesting is that this subject is being commented upon by a person who deals with "women's issues". Why is a matter concerning planning regulations turned into a gender issue? The closure or the blocking of planning permission for these establishments would presumably rob many women of their livelihoods. Women who work as dancers earn very good money and choose their profession of their own free will. Why is it that there is always the suggestion that these women are somehow coerced into work like this against their will?

Drunken Woman Driver

2008-07-29T14:50:00.004+01:00

Here's an interesting article about a drunken woman driver whose child screamed at passers by to help her.

Story here

Four times over the British drink driving limit?

Notice the comments from the Assistant Chief Constable;

"Never in my 29 years of policing, have I ever heard of such an incident where such a young child has alerted members of the public to a parent's totally unacceptable and inexcusable behaviour. While the court will address the driving consequences of this woman's behaviour, it is the underlying issues that have to be addressed by all our partners who are concerned with this driver and many other motorists' well-being as well as that of the general and motoring public."

Of course, this is but one incident that shows how women are drinking more and acting in a reckless manner. Many police officers state that drunken females are more of a problem than their male counterparts and more violent when challenged. So much for "sugar and spice".

Labour In Deep Trouble

2008-07-25T08:39:00.006+01:00

New Labour are in deep trouble after yet another by-election thrashing.

story here

Those in New Labour will tell you that their unpopularity is all down to the world recession and rising fuel prices. There's no doubt that these factors have caused part of the problem, but the Labour government is guilty of lavishly spending during the boom time and borrowing extra money to boot. This money was largely spent creating a government-dependant underclass, feminist-inspired social engineering and increasing the army of civil servants, another 900.000 to be precise since Labour came to power. Britain has the largest public sector borrowing deficit in the Western world and this existed long before the current world economic problems. Now that the recession has cut the amount of tax the exchequer receives, Labour are in deep trouble as their spending continues to grow while tax income drops. This is why they have not, for instance, cut fuel duty to help struggling motorists as the Americans have-they simply cannot afford to lose the tax revenue. The only thing this government can do is offer us excuses and "don't blame us" speeches. The trouble for them is that the British people know precisely where the blame lies. Had Labour stashed the cash during the boom they'd now have money to ease the pain of the recession, but because they didn't the pain that the electorate now feels is being reflected back at Labour. And why shouldn't it?

And, on the subject of New Labour's new army of snooping bureaucrats. Regular readers will know that when the smoking ban came into place I predicted that it wouldn't be long before councils realised they could use the legislation to reap rich rewards. Well it seems that it's already started.

story here

It seems this gentleman has appealed and I can tell him that he should win because the law specifically says that a works vehicle must be used by at least two people to be covered by the legislation. So, a vehicle used by one man business is exempt.

"Back From The Dead" Canoeist's Wife Found Guilty

2008-07-23T14:29:00.009+01:00

The wife of the man who faked his own death so that he and his wife could defraud an insurance company of £ 250,000, has been found guilty of fraud. Her husband had earlier pleaded guilty.

story here

You will notice that she resorted to the usual female plea of "He made me do it," despite the fact that it was she who claimed on the life insurance policies. And, just for once, she's been sentenced to a fractionally longer jail term than her husband. Usually, when a man and woman are found guilty of acting together illegally it's the man who receives the stiffer sentence and the woman often escapes jail altogether.

In a separate case, all proceedings have been dropped against John Leslie.

story here

It appears that yet again John Leslie and his family have been subjected to unsubstantiated allegations. Possibly some tabloid will pay a substantial amount of cash for this latest anonymous accuser's story while John Leslie has to cope with another whispering campaign.

John Leslie's lawyer said:

"He is of course delighted. The complaint was ridiculous, but yet again and for a second time his name has been dragged through the mud before the law has had a chance to confirm his innocence. The law confers a blanket of anonymity on complainants but the accused enjoys no such protection. Instead his reputation, his character, his career and his family are regarded as fair game by the media."

Charles Wheeler

2008-07-23T08:46:00.004+01:00

Older Men, Younger Women

2008-07-22T14:58:00.003+01:00

Older women always resent the fact that men are attracted to young women.

story here

In my view this is god's little joke. When a man is twenty he's attracted to twenty year-old women, but when he's fifty he's still attracted to twenty year-old women. Of course, the bitter old bags are very upset about this, especially those who are on their own and can't find a man to fund their lifestyle.

I'm middle-aged myself and I've often dated women young enough to be my daughter, and I've heard all the sneering comments from bitter old women and resentful men who wish they could exchange their own ageing partner for a young one like mine. Many women ask why men my age date young women? The answer is glaringly obvious when you look at the beauty of your young partner particularly when she's naked. The immeasurable beauty of an attractive young woman is obvious as is the ugliness of a wrinkly, sagging, fat old woman who is way past her prime. Unfortunately, a woman's physical prime is short-lived and many resent the fact that by their mid-thirties they are no longer attractive to men. Many women become resentful and inwardly ugly at this passing and replace youthful joy with bitter spite because men no longer pay them any attention. In my case it's usually the young women who make the move on me rather than the other way round. I find this both flattering and revealing about what women want in a man. Most women want to be taken care of and made to feel they are special and often they cannot find this in men their own age. I also believe that men are men and should act like it.

Many say that any relationship between an older man and a young woman will be short-lived, and I'd have to agree. However, I see this as a positive benefit rather than a problem, after all, the young beauty you're dating today will inevitably grow into old an ugly old trout in a few years and she'll probably turn into a nagging, spite-ridden, demanding bore as well. So, I'll keep dating young women as long as they'll have me and once the relationship becomes boring to me I'll ditch them and start again with another pretty young thing. If old women don't like this I don't care, I'll just be enjoying the company of their daughters.

Another Question, Another Answer.

2008-07-21T16:47:00.002+01:00

I've received another question following the one I was asked earlier this week about why I took a break from blogging a while back.

The questioner asks;

"I'd quite like to know what kind of hassle there was and from who"

My answer:

I'm a bit reluctant to talk about this in detail because it was all a bit sinister. Suffice to say that my phone was tapped and messages replayed to me after the call had ended. In other words someone wanted me to know they were listening to my phone calls. My businesses also received a lot of spot checks from official sources. I suppose these could have been random but the fact that they all occurred during a short period of time indicates to me that some kind of campaign was being waged against me in an effort to shut down my blog. Strangely other MRA bloggers were also "randomly" selected for this treatment.

It's easy to make more of this than is there but the phone experience was clearly a warning, as the people who do this kind of thing for a living aren't stupid enough to repeatedly replay conversations previously recorded, by accident. I also know that this is a standard security services frightener used many times before. Whomever was behind this harassment and whatever their motives it hasn't worked, as I intend to carry on posting.

One final thing. All this started after I was approached by someone purporting to be a TV researcher who claimed she was preparing a documentary about the "Nanny State". I was immediately suspicious because all her questioning related to MRA activities and she asked me if I could put her in touch with other MRAs who use pen names for their blogs. She also asked me if I knew these bloggers real names to which I replied "no" even though I do. It was then that she offered me a tidy sum of money to go to London to be interviewed for inclusion in the TV programme. I refused despite the increase in cash on offer.

I've said before that it is highly likely, indeed certain, that the security services are monitoring MRA activity, especially in the light of Fathers 4 Justice campaigns. Personally, if I were searching for subversives I'd look first at the current incumbents of high office which includes many former card carrying commies, student agitators and extreme feminists. Perhaps the next cabinet meeting would be a good place to start.

On The Fiddle?

2008-07-21T10:46:00.007+01:00

"The mother of reality TV star Kerry Katona is due to be sentenced for wrongly claiming income support and council tax benefit."

story here

It's amazing isn't it, how many women seem to be affected by mysterious, self-reported illnesses when confronted with their own wrongdoing? Usually, these are the illnesses on the fringe of believability that rely totally on the evidence of the patient themselves and clinicians have to take the word of the person reporting their own conditions, imagined or otherwise.

And, on a similar note, it seems likely that whichever party wins the next election, Britain's welfare state is due for a complete rethink due to the massive numbers of people claiming state benefits.

Story here

Of course, there are many genuine claimants who are injured, sick or unemployed due to redundancy, but there are many who abuse the system because they are lazy or can't face having to do as they are told when employed. The welfare state has become a fishing net instead of a safety net where many people make their own lives fit the circumstances that pay the most in benefit. Single-mothers are just such a case where many women and young girls deliberately seek this feckless lifestyle in order to reap generous, long term benefit payments. The gravy train is now grinding to a halt as it nears the buffers laid across the track by the downturn in the economy.

An Answer To A Question.

2008-07-19T09:00:00.004+01:00

A couple of days ago I was asked this question by Franko:

"Hi captain. please can you explain why some of your older stuff is gone. On your website, you said there was a reason, and, as an avid reader, please can you shed some light. Ive been reading you for almost 18 months now and am very curious. thanks, franko."

Most of the original content is still available on my main website in the archives section. I've also re-edited some of my posts into topics such as "Politics" and "Feminism". The reason I deleted them from my blog was that I received some hassle from officialdom.

It's clear that the authorities are monitoring blogs such as mine and then hassling the writers. Funnily enough though, much of what I've written is now being adopted as government policy! My predictions about the credit crunch, which I made three years ago, have also come to pass. My own view is that government flunkies are watching blogs to gauge public opinion and harvesting new ideas on offer from writers like me. At the same time they are worried that their government's thinking is out of kilter with ordinary people's everyday experiences. On some occasions this monitoring reshapes government policy, although they'd never admit it! This government monitoring is nothing new. In the fifties and sixties, MI5 and other agencies watched fringe newspapers and their readership in case they were subversive. Once a popular groundswell of opinion supports a particular belief it's quite common for that opinion to be officially adopted and the government claim it as an idea they thought of themselves even though it initially came from a "subversive" source.

What's different now is that many more outlets exist for new thinking. Blogs and websites are easy to set up and many more of us beat the drum for whatever cause we believe in. Government agencies are without doubt watching our blogs as a means of monitoring public opinion and watching out for those who would break the law. It's likely that political researchers are doing the same as a modern method for finding out "the word on the street". They in turn will report back to their political masters with ideas and opinions garnered from blogs. These are then re-packaged as new party policies.

Stop The World, I Want To Get Off!

2008-07-17T12:58:00.006+01:00

Two-thirds of British women with young children don't want to work, according to a recent poll.

story here

So there you have it, feminism's great social-engineering experiment is dead and buried. It seems women now want what they had before feminism and many cannot achieve this because they need two incomes to run one household, thanks largely to the number of women working which has caused massive inflation in the housing market. And, to add to modern women's self-imposed unhappiness, most men now avoid marriage because of feminist inspired, man-hating divorce laws. Women who previously supported feminism may wish to re-examine their attitudes. Many women thought that feminism would bring them greater freedom and more choices in life when in reality quite the reverse has occurred.

Own goal I think.

It's About Time!

2008-07-17T08:35:00.004+01:00

In Britain, the Ministry of Defence has announced plans to double the compensation paid to injured service personnel.

story here

It's about time, as the existing compensation paid to injured service personnel (nearly always men) is pitiful and a fraction of that paid in sexual discrimination cases, which, of course, is only ever paid to females. The amount on offer for sex discrimination is unlimited and massive payments are common, paid for the most trivial of reasons and, typically, totally reliant on the word of the woman herself. One female former army major received over £ 500,000 some years ago because she was dismissed when she became pregnant after an affair with a fellow officer.

It seems our society has a perverse sense of values.

Lying Women

2008-07-09T08:57:00.003+01:00

Recently, my cleaner has related to me the gory details of her marriage break-up. The story goes something like this:

She married her husband when she “accidentally” became pregnant about three years ago. At the time she’d only known him for a few months and those, like me, with a few more miles on our clocks, didn’t give their marriage more than a few months. Sure enough he left a couple of months ago. Since then, my cleaner has related her own mini soap opera with her cast in the starring role. The latest episode involves a visit her soon to be ex-husband made to pick up his son. She claims that her child was “snatched” the details of which, or at least her account of it, were quickly reported to the police. They in turn told her that since she hasn’t yet got a residency order the child’s father has just as much right to take him out as she has. She loudly disputed this claiming that the child was solely hers. What actually happened was that her husband turned up for a pre-arranged visit to take the child out whereupon the mother started an argument. When her husband attempted to leave she tried to stop him as he walked down the path. He continued to his car and drove off with the child as arranged. He later returned at the proper pre-arranged time and returned the child. Not quite a kidnapping to rival the Lindbergh case is it?

Last night I watched one of these CCTV/police documentaries. In it, a woman reported that her husband had assaulted her. Police turned up and arrested her husband. Case closed - or was it? The CCTV operator had focussed his camera on the house where they alleged assault was taking place only to view the woman being repeatedly punched by a female friend. This at the request of the woman making the complaint in order to frame her husband for assault. The woman was later charged with perverting the course of justice, but what would have happened if the CCTV camera had not picked up the evidence against her? In all likelihood the police and the court would have accepted her word for the fact that her husband had perpetrated the assault and he would undoubtedly have been found guilty, simply on her word.

These little anecdotes show perfectly the problems men face when dealing with women. They have a never-ending habit of wildly exaggerating innocent events and in turn tittle-tattling these stories to third parties in order to get their own way. Women lie and cheat as a knee-jerk reaction to any problem especially when dealing with their relationships with men. Furthermore, women have absolutely no conscience about deliberately lying in this way because for them all that matters is that they get their own way. In the light of this, men like me ask if it is possible to have anything like a permanent relationship with a woman. Personally, I don’t think it is.

Police Chief Slams Gang Culture

2008-07-02T08:36:00.002+01:00

A senior police chief has stated that gang culture has replaced family life in many of Britain's children's lives.

story here

I whole-heartedly agree with these comments, but we must also ask why this situation has arisen. In my view the deterioration in family life has exactly mirrored the growth of feminism, which in turn has eroded the role of fathers in children's lives. In Britain today it is government policy to exclude fathers from their children's lives following a divorce, and I should know because I've not seen my kids for 10 years. This because my ex-wife wanted it that way and the Family Courts routinely rubber stamp the wishes of spiteful females. The result is that many children grow up in fatherless, chaotic households without discipline and any sense of responsibility.

This government also encourages the feckless, single-mother lifestyle. Britain is the single-mother capital of Europe and it's no surprise that our country also has the worst behaved kids. Unfortunately, the politicians who created this situation still refuse to accept that their social-engineering experiment has created a monster. Until they do the stabbings and shootings will continue.

Time For Equality

2008-06-29T09:00:00.004+01:00

Those of you who heard Harriet Harman in Parliament last week, bleating her usual feminist propaganda about the so-called "gender pay gap" and equality, will perhaps be interested in my views on the subject. I'm sick of repeating the real reasons this occurs but here they are yet again:

1. Men work more hours than women, on average 25% longer working weeks. One in four men work more than 50 hours a week whilst only one in two hundred women work such hours. Because many people are paid by the hour it's not surprising that those working the most hours make more money! Women often work job shares, flexible working hours and turn up when you want schemes, men do not because we are not allowed to.

2. Men do most of life's dangerous jobs which of course carry premium wages. That's why 95% of the people killed in the workplace are men. If employers didn't pay extra money for these jobs then no one would do them.

I think it's time we called women's bluff an introduced legislation to make the workplace truly equal. And so I propose the following measures to ensure that women can enjoy all the "benefits" of being male:

1. The immediate introduction of a 50/50 policy for recruitment to the armed forces. There would be a need to introduce conscription for females aged 18 - 25 in order to redress the balance between male and female soldiers. Once these female conscripts have completed basic training they can be sent straight to Afghanistan and Iraq having first collected their own personal body bag. They can then enjoy all the benefits of armed combat first hand.

2. The introduction of enforced labour to recruit females to work as sewer workers, oil rig crews, high-rise construction gangs, deep-sea fishing trawler workers, electricity pylon climbers, aerial riggers, etc...etc.

3. A law should be passed to prevent any woman marrying a man who earns more than she does, in order to avoid such females being patronised by their high-earning husband.

4. The reversal of the policy which awards child custody to mothers so that women can enjoy working 60 hours a week in order to hand over most of their earnings to their former husband.

5. New retirement ages for men and women. Men should now retire at 50 and women can retire at 75.

The New World Order?

2008-06-26T09:07:00.014+01:00

David Icke has decided to stand in the Howden by-election.

story here

I say good luck to him. David Icke has long been ridiculed by the mainstream media but it's worth reading his writings on issue of "The New World Order". After researching his stuff, I find myself in agreement with much of what he says.

With people like David it's always a mistake to make a judgment about him based on comments and stories in the media, as these are usually distorted to suit the media's own agenda.

Meanwhile, the British Marxist (sorry, New Labour) government's plan to rule every aspect of our lives goes on.

story here

So, what Harman is saying is that it's alright to discriminate against people as long as those discriminated against are white, hetero sexual males. Seems to be an absence of logic in that one!

What happened to "equality"?

The true agenda is revealed is it not?

You may know that Harman knows all about privelege because she's from a very well-to-do family and attended one of the top private girls schools in the country. So our Harriet had a good start in life didn't she? Of course, she doesn't exactly shout about her wealthy, priveleged background now she's found a home in New Marxists sorry New Labour. So to help you decide, here's her entry in Wikipedia.

Odd isn't that Harman was a big noise at The National Council For Civil Liberties but now she favours the 42 day detention without trial of terror suspects?

It's also interesting to quote this from the Wikipedia entry:

In 1990 Harman co-authored a report entitled "The Family Way". It criticised the family unit and mothers who stay at home. In particular it questioned whether men were an asset to families at all and whether "the presence of fathers in families is necessarily a means to social harmony and cohesion". Critics such as Erin Pizzey described such statements as a "staggering attack on men and their role in modern life".

You may formulate the opinion that Harriet Harman doesn't like men.

And these are the consequences of this social engineering that seeks to demonise men.

story here

Is this the world you want to live in?

The Misuse Of Power

2008-06-23T09:46:00.007+01:00

Councils have been caught using anti-terror laws to snoop on private citizens for trivial reasons.

story here

This proves that once bureaucratic power mongers have power they will inevitably use it, often for the most trivial of reasons. Any excuse will be found for big government agencies to flex their muscles and abuse their new powers. It's in the nature of the beast and will always happen. That's why these powers should be rationed in the first place, only granted in extreme conditions and closely monitored.

When CCTV was introduced to Britain, we were told that it would not impinge on our human rights and would be their to protect us from serious crime. A few years on and look what's happened. CCTV systems proliferate in areas hardly touched by crime with councils drawing down funding from central government to pay for it. London now has more public area CCTV cameras than the whole of the United States! Britain now has the largest DNA database in the world and many of those on it have not been convicted of any crime.

Snoop, snoop, snoop!

The new ID cards will be exactly the same. The government says they plan to introduce them on a voluntary basis, but you can bet that once they are introduced anyone not having one will be barred from public buildings. You'll also not be able to cash a cheque or use your credit card without the "voluntary" ID card. Inevitably most people will be forced to apply for an ID card simply to carry on their daily lives and once 50% of people have one the government will claim that this gives them a mandate to make ID cards compulsory. Once they've done this you'll have to carry it everywhere you go or face a fine and possible arrest. So a quick trip to the shops without your ID card could get you arrested and fined £200.

If you think this won't happen, refer to the story above!

1 Woman - 105 Men

2008-06-20T08:34:00.005+01:00

The media in Britain has gone into overdrive due to the latest tragic losses in Afghanistan.

story here

You will notice that nearly all the attention is focused on the fact that a female soldier has been killed. This is the first female fatality in Afghanistan and as far as the media is concerned this soldier's death is more important than the deaths of the 105 men who've been killed in the conflict.

Why is this?

Because she's female.

Of course the loss of this woman is tragic, but is it any more tragic than the loss of each of the 105 men who've been killed in Afghanistan? According to the media it is more significant, at least that's the message judging by the number of column inches and news reports on TV.

Personally, I mourn all those service personnel who've been killed.

Blears Loses Secret Files

2008-06-17T19:28:00.004+01:00

Hazel Blears has lost important secret files during a robbery at her offices.

story here

I find this story hysterically funny because Blears is possibly the smuggest person in the world. I find her totally annoying. It is the latest in a catalogue of blunders concerning top secret documents being lost or stolen.

The Erosion Of Freedom

2008-06-13T14:14:00.006+01:00

Tory M.P. David Davis has resigned to force a by-election on the issue of 42 day detention without trial for terrorist suspects.

story here

The fools are the people who think that 42 day detention will help the fight against terrorism, it will not. The result will be the same as the effect that Internment had in Northern Ireland, i.e. a monumental own goal.

The greatest threat to the terrorists themselves and their evil plots is the passing of information to the authorities from the community in which they live. The introduction of 42 day detention will make those people with information less keen on reporting suspicious behaviour in case they or their families/friends end up banged up for six weeks without charge, even though they are completely innocent. It will also lead to innocent suspects being left on the back burner by the police while they deal with those who are more involved in any alleged plot.

Whenever I hear politicians talking about "getting tough" I always shudder because this kind of talk is mindless rhetoric meant to distract the electorate from the real issues. I say good luck to David Davis

Man Dies After "Supermarket Rage" Attack.

2008-06-12T09:41:00.003+01:00

A man has died after a woman allegedly rang her boyfriend to complain the victim had pushed in front of her in a supermarket check-out.

story here

The interesting thing is that the woman has not been arrested. Why did she ring her boyfriend and what did she think he'd do? What indeed. Personally, I wouldn't ring someone simply because a person shoved in front of me. If I did I'd be on the phone every twenty minutes.

Females are very good at provoking men to commit violence on their behalf. Many quite like the idea that they have a thug boyfriend on hand to sort out their imaginary problems. Most are never prosecuted when things turn ugly so continue this behaviour.

More Children Living In Poverty

2008-06-10T13:20:00.006+01:00

More children and pensioners are on or below the poverty line in Britain than this time last year.
story here

This despite Tony Blair's 1999 promise to eradicate poverty by 2020. It seems that the more benefits are handed out the more people find themselves in receipt of them. This is socialism's gaping flaw which encourages people not to take care of their own lives and become dependent on big government handouts. More than 50% of Britain's population rely on the government for the majority of their income. This includes civil servants, those in receipt of benefits and the 900,000 strong new army of state bureaucrats who are paid to snoop on the rest of us.

The only way to get children out of poverty is to get the traditional family (i.e. a family that includes a working father) to become the norm again. The trouble is that all politicians pander to the idea that women should have umpteen choices which includes being a single mother sponging off the taxpayer. No surprise that many women quite fancy this indolent lifestyle.

Who pays the ultimate price for these female choices?

Children.

Highway Robbery

2008-06-09T16:39:00.003+01:00

Manchester looks set to introduce a congestion charge.

story here

I suppose it's a good thing to bring in measures to reduce congestion but we know the real reason why this Labour government is so keen to get this scheme for Manchester, and other cities, up and running. We all have a sneaking suspicion that the real driving force (sorry about the pun) is simply to squeeze extra cash from Britain's drivers in order to fund Labour's ever increasing army of non-working loafers. The explosive cost of social security benefits sprayed around by Labour has hit a record high. Of course, Labour cannot raise the money needed by using words like "tax" so they siphon off cash using schemes like the congestion charge. It wouldn't be so bad if the money raised was used exclusively on public transport, but it won't be. It'll end up in the black hole that is socialist Labour spending.

Sense At Last

2008-05-31T08:44:00.003+01:00

It seems some common sense may at last be permeating the ranks of this government thinking. Finally, they seem to have grasped the concept that their own meddling is causing problems as with this latest U turn.

story here

Socialist governments always mess and meddle in people's lives in the misguided belief that they are improving things. The trouble is that when humans are confronted with targets based on statistics, all that happens is that the people involved find a way to manipulate the statistics and are unable to do the job they are paid for. In the case of the police this is no surprise as many in the current Cabinet are former commie agitators much seen on demonstrations in their younger days. It's no surprise that these former radicals do not trust the police. The answer is to let professionals get on with their jobs free from political interference and free from reams of government inspired paperwork with no purpose other than providing meaningless statistics for politicians to mull over.

Let the police do their work.

Back To Work

2008-05-27T20:52:00.003+01:00

The Conservatives have unveiled plans to force the long term unemployed back into work.

Story here

Not before time either. I can only assume that those in the Conservative party have been reading my blog. The key point is that many people seem to view work as an optional activity. Notice, however, that there's no mention of single mothers who are the greatest drain on the public purse. Don't want to upset females do we? Oh no. Personally that's where I'd start.

The Great British Swindle

2008-05-22T18:50:00.001+01:00

British people have never been more unhappy according to this story:

story here

As far as I'm concerned we've been conned in the biggest possible way. Years ago, women were encouraged to go out to work, which enabled couples to obtain more credit, particularly when it came to getting a mortgage. This additional credit fuelled massive inflation in house prices which in turn required higher mortgage commitments. Nowadays, families need two incomes to get the same living standard that could be achieved with one income twenty years ago. Who benefits from this? Banks and building societies who now lend more money to the average family which, of course, generates more profits for them. So women entering the workplace en masse has not resulted in any financial benefit, indeed, quite the reverse is the case. Furthermore, women no longer have a choice as to whether they work or not once they've had kids. For most women there is now only one choice. Men never had any choice other than work till you drop.

The result of all this has been a disaster for ordinary working people.

Fatherless Children

2008-05-22T12:17:00.007+01:00

Britain's parliament has voted to allow lesbians and single females the right to have IVF treatment.

story here

In other words, our government doesn't think that fathers have any significant role in a child's development other than supplying cash in one form or another.

It was very revealing to watch the debate in parliament. Iain Duncan Smith MP quoted a dossier of facts that proved conclusively that children are far better off when raised by a family that includes their dad (their real dad that is and not mummy's latest boyfriend). And, children raised by a single mother are massively disadvantaged, do poorly in education, are drawn to criminal behaviour, abuse alcohol and drugs and have much higher incidence of psychiatric disorders. Some Labour commie-feminist countered with the usual diatribe consisting entirely of cliches learnt in women's study classes. These people never cloud any issue with facts, they simply bellow feminist dogma because feminist dogma is all they have.

Of course, it's the children who suffer the consequences of this commie-feminist social engineering which is based on a blind hatred of men. To these people it appears that children do not really matter, at least their well-being is outweighed be the need for females to have endless choices no matter what the consequences may be.

New Labour's quest to exclude and now preclude fathers from children's' lives goes on, driven by the need to appease man-hating feminists who now form a large part of this government. The massive increase in youth crime, alcohol abuse, drug taking and a disintegration of family life, is there for all to see. The packs of feral children that roam our streets is testament to the failure of New Labour and its feminist/commie policies. The shootings, stabbings and street violence that now forms a part of children's lives in Britain is a direct result of fatherless families.

God help our children.

Women With Guns No. 2

2008-05-21T15:53:00.003+01:00

Yesterday, I warned of the dangers of females with guns. Well, here's another example, this time from a female cop.....scary!

And what's the betting that no disciplinary action was taken against her, despite the fact she almost shot her colleague.

Keep off the streets people.

Guns Are Dangerous

2008-05-20T10:33:00.002+01:00

Guns can be very dangerous especially in the hands of a female. This woman is about to fire a very powerful handgun.....watch the recoil dear.

Oooops....told you!

Sweatshop Britain

2008-05-17T12:07:00.004+01:00

This week the government announced legislation which gives more employees the right to ask for flexible working hours. You will notice that all the official blurb talks about "parents" when in reality they mean "mothers" because 95% of requests for flexible working come from female employees and with all things concerning this present government you have to play the game of "Spot the hidden agenda" when viewing these changes.

The real reason behind New Labour's enthusiasm for flexible working is in reality an attempt to get back into work the hoards of benefit-sapping single mothers. The Blair/Brown government created a massive army of single mothers when it increased benefits to a point where many single mothers are better off than couples who both work. Not surprisingly, many women now view work and husbands as optional and choose to sponge off the taxpayer. The cost of this has sky rocketed beyond belief and Social Security costs now account for almost two thirds of government spending. The excuse single mothers use for not working is that they cannot find a job that allows them time to look after their kids. So, hey presto, out pops legislation that in the fullness of time will entitle employees to demand flexible working, thereby eliminating a single mother's main excuse for not working.

The cost of this change is, of course, dumped on employers and it's small businesses which will suffer the most. Large organisations can more easily take up the slack left by absent females (i.e. men will end up with all the crap shifts and even longer working weeks), but small businesses will find it hard and may feel bullied into agreeing to demands for female-friendly working hours. You can bet that it won't be long before some disgruntled female will sue her employer and win damages for sex-discrimination simply because she's been refused flexible working. So, to all intents these "requests" will soon become "demands".

Of course, employers can always take the easier option of only employing men who, by the way, still work on average 25% longer working weeks than females.